Quadro P520 vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Quadro P520
Popular choices:
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P520 is positioned at rank #111 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P520
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000).
| Insight | Quadro P520 | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | RDNA 2 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P520 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P520 and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Quadro P520
The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 26 2022. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P520 scores 2,034 and the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P520 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) uses RDNA 2, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P520) vs 128 (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,034+2% | 2,000 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+200% | 128 |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | 2200 MHz+47% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P520 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has 0 MB. The Quadro P520 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P520 draws 18W versus the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)'s 15W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P520) vs 1W (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W | 15W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0 | 133.3+18% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P520 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (Quadro P520) vs Infinity (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) — the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro P520 | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108 | Raphael |
| Release | May 23 2019 | September 26 2022 |
| Ranking | #677 | #729 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P520 and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
