GeForce RTX 4070
VS
Iris Pro Graphics 580

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 580

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070

#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
112%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
111%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
111%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
110%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
109%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
108%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
107%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
107%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
105%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
103%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
103%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
102%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
101%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
101%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
100%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
99%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
99%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
97%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
97%
#58
Arc A380
MSRP: $149|Avg: $119
95%
#59
Radeon RX 9070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
94%
#60
Radeon RX 7900 XT
MSRP: $899|Avg: $630
94%
#61
GeForce RTX 4080
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $800
84%
#62
Arc A310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
82%
#63
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
MSRP: $799|Avg: $800
81%
#64
Radeon RX 9070 XT
MSRP: $599|Avg: $700
79%
#65
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
MSRP: $749|Avg: $850
78%
#66
Radeon RX 6900 XT
MSRP: $999|Avg: $385
78%
#67
GeForce GTX 1630
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
75%
#68
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1256.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 580.

InsightGeForce RTX 4070Iris Pro Graphics 580
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1256.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1256.1%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (304mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Iris Pro Graphics 580

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 580

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Iris Pro Graphics 580's 1,985 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1256.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Iris Pro Graphics 580
G3D Mark Score
26,919+1256%
1,985
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Generation 9.0
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
5888+922%
576
Compute (TFLOPS)
29.15 TFLOPS+2565%
1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2475 MHz+161%
950 MHz
ROPs
64+611%
9
TMUs
184+156%
72

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Iris Pro Graphics 580
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Iris Pro Graphics 580
VRAM Capacity
12 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6X
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
504 GB/s
System
Bus Width
192-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Iris Pro Graphics 580
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Pro Graphics 580).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Iris Pro Graphics 580
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Quick Sync Video
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
Quick Sync Video
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 580's 45W — a 126.5% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Iris Pro Graphics 580
TDP
200W
45W-78%
Recommended PSU
650W
0W-100%
Power Connector
8-pin
None
Length
304mm
0mm
Height
137mm
0mm
Slots
3
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80
Perf/Watt
134.6+205%
44.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 costs 100+% less ($550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) — the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070Iris Pro Graphics 580
MSRP
$599
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$550
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
48.9
Infinity
Codename
AD104
Skylake GT4e
Release
April 12 2023
September 1 2015
Ranking
#32
#707