
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Popular choices:

Iris Pro Graphics P580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000).
| Insight | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Iris Pro Graphics P580

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 26 2022. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) scores 2,000 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 reaches 2,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is built on RDNA 2 while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 128 (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,000 | 2,026+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 128 | 576+350% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+110% | 1050 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) draws 15W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 133.3 | 135.1+1% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150 and now averages $60. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 33.8 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) — the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 33.8 |
| Codename | Raphael | Skylake GT4e |
| Release | September 26 2022 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #729 | #678 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.


















