Radeon HD 4270 vs Radeon HD 7290

AMD

Radeon HD 4270

2008Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7290

2013Core: 950 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 4270 vs Radeon HD 7290 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4270 vs Radeon HD 7290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4270 vs Radeon HD 7290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4270

2008

Why buy it

  • Draws 150W instead of 375W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7290 across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% HIGHER MSRP
    $50 MSRPvs$20 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $20 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7290

2013

Why buy it

  • 52.3% more average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $30 less on MSRP ($20 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • Delivers 154.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($20 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% higher power demand at 375W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 7290 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 52.3% in average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (112 vs 110), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 4270 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7290 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $20 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 154.5% (5.6 vs 2.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7290 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 4270 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 4270 vs Radeon HD 7290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 4270

The Radeon HD 4270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 110 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon HD 7290

The Radeon HD 7290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 112 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4270 scores 110 and the Radeon HD 7290 reaches 112 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4270 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 7290 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4270) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7290). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4270) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7290).

FeatureRadeon HD 4270Radeon HD 7290
G3D Mark Score
110
112+2%
Architecture
TeraScale
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800
2048 ×2+156%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.2 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS ×2+241%
ROPs
16
32 ×2+100%
TMUs
40
128 ×2+220%
L1 Cache
160 KB
512 KB+220%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4270Radeon HD 7290
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4270 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7290. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4270) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7290) — the Radeon HD 7290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4270Radeon HD 7290
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4270 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7290's 375W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon HD 4270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4270) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7290). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 4270Radeon HD 7290
TDP
150W-60%
375W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
0.7+133%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 4270 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 7290 launched at $20. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7290 was 60% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (Radeon HD 4270) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 7290) — the Radeon HD 7290 offers 154.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7290 (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 4270Radeon HD 7290
MSRP
$50
$20-60%
Performance per Dollar
2.2
5.6+155%
Codename
RV770
Malta
Release
June 25 2008
April 24 2013
Ranking
#784
#412

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.