GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 4270

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4270

2008Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 4270 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 4270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 4270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 320M

2017

Why buy it

  • 46.4% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4270

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 320M across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 320M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.4% in average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (114 vs 110), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4270 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4270 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 320M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 4270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon HD 4270

The Radeon HD 4270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 110 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 320M scores 114 and the Radeon HD 4270 reaches 110 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 320M is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 4270 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4270). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M) vs 1.2 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4270).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 4270
G3D Mark Score
114+4%
110
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale
Process Node
14 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS
1.2 TFLOPS+6%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
144 KB
160 KB+11%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4270 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 4270
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 320M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4270 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 320M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320M and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4270. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 320M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4270) — the GeForce GT 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 4270
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_1) (GeForce GT 320M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4270). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 4270
DirectX
11.1 (FL10_1)+10%
10.1
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 320M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 4270).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 4270
Encoder
VP4
Decoder
VP4
UVD 2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 320M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 4270's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 320M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 4270
TDP
30W-80%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
3.8+443%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 320M (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 4270
MSRP
$50
Codename
GP108
RV770
Release
May 17 2017
June 25 2008
Ranking
#641
#784

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.