
Radeon HD 4270

RADEON X800 GTO
Radeon HD 4270 vs RADEON X800 GTO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 4270 vs RADEON X800 GTO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Civilization VI

Dead by Daylight
Radeon HD 4270 vs RADEON X800 GTO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 4270
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 280.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X800 GTO across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RADEON X800 GTO
2020Why buy it
- ✅52.2% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Radeon HD 4270 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X800 GTO is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌298% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4270 vs RADEON X800 GTO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 4270
The Radeon HD 4270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 110 points. Launch price was $299.

RADEON X800 GTO
The RADEON X800 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4270 scores 110 and the RADEON X800 GTO reaches 115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4270 is built on TeraScale while the RADEON X800 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4270) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 GTO). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4270) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 GTO).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4270 | RADEON X800 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 110 | 115+5% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 4608+476% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS+1628% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 40 | 288+620% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 1 MB+525% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4270 | RADEON X800 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4270 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 GTO carries 256 MB. Radeon HD 4270 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4270 and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 GTO. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4270) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 GTO) — the RADEON X800 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4270 | RADEON X800 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4270 draws 150W versus the RADEON X800 GTO's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 4270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4270) vs 350W (RADEON X800 GTO). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4270 | RADEON X800 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-50% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7+75% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 4270 came in at $50, while the RADEON X800 GTO launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4270 was 74.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (Radeon HD 4270) vs 0.6 (RADEON X800 GTO) — the Radeon HD 4270 offers 266.7% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X800 GTO (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4270 | RADEON X800 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-75% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2+267% | 0.6 |
| Codename | RV770 | Navi 21 |
| Release | June 25 2008 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #784 | #42 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














