Radeon HD 4850
VS
Quadro 2000D

Radeon HD 4850 vs Quadro 2000D

AMD

Radeon HD 4850

2008Core: 625 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

2011Core: 625 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4850 is positioned at rank 237 and the Quadro 2000D is on rank 311, so the Radeon HD 4850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4850

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1527%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1467%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1450%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1448%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1445%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1436%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1418%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1413%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1400%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1396%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1379%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1376%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1352%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1351%
#99
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
#222
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1684%
#237
Radeon HD 4850
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
100%
#238
Radeon R5 M240
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#239
Radeon HD 4350
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
99%
#240
RADEON HD 6350
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
99%
#241
Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $25
98%
#244
Radeon HD 7560D
MSRP: $101|Avg: $15
94%
#246
GeForce GTS 250
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
93%
#248
GeForce G100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
93%
#249
Radeon R7 M265
MSRP: $130|Avg: $30
91%
#250
Radeon HD 8250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
89%
#251
Radeon HD 3300
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000D

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
96%
#296
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9008%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
100%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
99%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
98%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
96%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
96%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
94%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
93%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
93%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
93%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
92%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
90%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
87%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
87%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
85%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4850.

InsightRadeon HD 4850Quadro 2000D
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%)
Leading raw performance (+3.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (246mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro 2000D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000D holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $199), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 415.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 4850Quadro 2000D
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+415.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4850 and Quadro 2000D

AMD

Radeon HD 4850

The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4850 scores 946 and the Quadro 2000D reaches 980 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4850 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro 2000D uses Fermi, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 192 (Quadro 2000D). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D).

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Quadro 2000D
G3D Mark Score
946
980+4%
Architecture
TeraScale
Fermi
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800+317%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1 TFLOPS+108%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
160 KB
256 KB+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Quadro 2000D
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4850 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000D has 4 GB. The Quadro 2000D offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Quadro 2000D
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4850 draws 110W versus the Quadro 2000D's 62W — a 55.8% difference. The Quadro 2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 4850) vs 350W (Quadro 2000D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Quadro 2000D
TDP
110W
62W-44%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
246mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
8.6
15.8+84%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Quadro 2000D launched at $599 and now averages $40. The Quadro 2000D costs 79.9% less ($159 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 24.5 (Quadro 2000D) — the Quadro 2000D offers 410.4% better value. The Quadro 2000D is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Quadro 2000D
MSRP
$199-67%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$199
$40-80%
Performance per Dollar
4.8
24.5+410%
Codename
RV770
GF106
Release
June 25 2008
October 5 2011
Ranking
#876
#892