Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce RTX 3070
Radeon HD 4850
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 4850 is positioned at rank #237 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4850
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4850 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2243.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4850.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4850 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2243.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2243.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (246mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $199), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2232% better value per dollar than the Radeon HD 4850.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4850 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2232%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($199) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4850 and GeForce RTX 3070
Radeon HD 4850
The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 4850 scores 946 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 2243.8%. The Radeon HD 4850 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 55 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 946 | 22,172+2244% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Ampere |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 5888+636% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+1931% |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 40 | 184+360% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 5.8 MB+3525% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4850 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4850) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 Ultimate+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 4850) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4850) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4850 draws 110W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 4850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 4850) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 246mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-50% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 246mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | 75°C-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 8.6 | 100.8+1072% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The Radeon HD 4850 costs 0.5% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 2210.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-60% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | 110.9+2210% |
| Codename | RV770 | GA104 |
| Release | June 25 2008 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #876 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4850 and GeForce RTX 3070
