Radeon HD 4850
VS
Radeon 620

Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon 620

AMD

Radeon HD 4850

2008Core: 625 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 620

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4850 is positioned at rank 237 and the Radeon 620 is on rank 375, so the Radeon HD 4850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4850

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1527%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1467%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1450%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1448%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1445%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1436%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1418%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1413%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1400%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1396%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1379%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1376%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1352%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1351%
#99
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
#222
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1684%
#237
Radeon HD 4850
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
100%
#238
Radeon R5 M240
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#239
Radeon HD 4350
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
99%
#240
RADEON HD 6350
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
99%
#241
Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $25
98%
#244
Radeon HD 7560D
MSRP: $101|Avg: $15
94%
#246
GeForce GTS 250
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
93%
#248
GeForce G100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
93%
#249
Radeon R7 M265
MSRP: $130|Avg: $30
91%
#250
Radeon HD 8250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
89%
#251
Radeon HD 3300
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 620

#365
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1138%
#367
1032%
#368
1029%
#372
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
936%
#373
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
929%
#375
Radeon 620
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#376
Radeon R5 435
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#380
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
93%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
91%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
90%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
90%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 620 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon 620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4850 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4850 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 4850Radeon 620
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (246mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon 620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $199 for the Radeon HD 4850, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 301.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 4850Radeon 620
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+301.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon 620

AMD

Radeon HD 4850

The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon 620

The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4850 scores 946 and the Radeon 620 reaches 954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4850 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon 620 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 384 (Radeon 620). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 620).

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Radeon 620
G3D Mark Score
946
954
Architecture
TeraScale
GCN 3.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1 TFLOPS+27%
0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
160 KB+67%
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Radeon 620
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4850 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 620 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4850 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4850) vs 128 KB (Radeon 620) — the Radeon HD 4850 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Radeon 620
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4850 draws 110W versus the Radeon 620's 50W — a 75% difference. The Radeon 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 4850) vs 350W (Radeon 620). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Radeon 620
TDP
110W
50W-55%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
246mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
8.6
19.1+122%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Radeon 620 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Radeon 620 costs 74.9% less ($149 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 19.1 (Radeon 620) — the Radeon 620 offers 297.9% better value. The Radeon 620 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Radeon 620
MSRP
$199
$100-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$199
$50-75%
Performance per Dollar
4.8
19.1+298%
Codename
RV770
Polaris 24
Release
June 25 2008
May 13 2019
Ranking
#876
#898