
Radeon HD 4850

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 4850
2008Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌43.2% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
2025Why buy it
- ✅78.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 4850
The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4850 scores 946 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4850 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 946+3% | 921 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 4096+412% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+4684% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 40 | 256+540% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4850 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 4850 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4850 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4850) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4850 draws 110W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon HD 4850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 4850) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-63% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 246mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.6+177% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 4850 came in at $199, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E was 30.2% cheaper ($60 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers 37.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4850 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $139-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | 6.6+38% |
| Codename | RV770 | Navi 48 |
| Release | June 25 2008 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #876 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














