Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

AMD

Radeon HD 4850

2008Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4850

2008

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 43.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025

Why buy it

  • 78.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $60 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 39.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 78.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 4850 instead at 946 vs 921, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 55nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E makes the most sense to buy today. It is $60 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 39.4% (6.6 vs 4.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 4850

The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4850 scores 946 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4850 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E).

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
G3D Mark Score
946+3%
921
Architecture
TeraScale
Bristol Ridge
Process Node
55 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
800
4096+412%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+4684%
ROPs
16
128+700%
TMUs
40
256+540%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4850 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 4850 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4850 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4850) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4850 draws 110W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon HD 4850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 4850) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
TDP
110W-63%
300W
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
246mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
8.6+177%
3.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 4850 came in at $199, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E was 30.2% cheaper ($60 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers 37.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 4850Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP
$199
$139-30%
Performance per Dollar
4.8
6.6+38%
Codename
RV770
Navi 48
Release
June 25 2008
July 23 2025
Ranking
#876
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.