Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 4850

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 4850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 4850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000D

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 62W instead of 110W, a 48W reduction.
✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4850 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
201% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4850

2008

Why buy it

✅3.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 190.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌77.4% higher power demand at 110W vs 62W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4850 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 2000D instead at 980 vs 946, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 2000D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4850 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 190.6% (4.8 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4850 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2000D has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 4850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2000D

The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 4850

The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000D scores 980 and the Radeon HD 4850 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000D is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 4850 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000D) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850).

Feature	Quadro 2000D	Radeon HD 4850
G3D Mark Score	980+4%	946
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	192	800+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	1 TFLOPS+108%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	256 KB+60%	160 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2000D	Radeon HD 4850
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000D has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 carries 2 GB. Quadro 2000D gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000D and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4850.

Feature	Quadro 2000D	Radeon HD 4850
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000D draws 62W versus the Radeon HD 4850's 110W — a 55.8% difference. The Quadro 2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000D) vs 450W (Radeon HD 4850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro 2000D	Radeon HD 4850
TDP	62W-44%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	246mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	95
Perf/Watt	15.8+84%	8.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000D came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4850 was 66.8% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000D) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) — the Radeon HD 4850 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 2000D (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro 2000D	Radeon HD 4850
MSRP	$599	$199-67%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	4.8+200%
Codename	GF106	RV770
Release	October 5 2011	June 25 2008
Ranking	#892	#876

Search Quadro 2000D on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4850 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.