
GeForce GT 1010
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 4850
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GT 1010
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 192.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 4850: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 4850 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 110W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 147mm instead of 246mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon HD 4850
2008Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌184.3% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 30W.
- ❌67.3% longer card at 246mm vs 147mm.
GeForce GT 1010
2021Radeon HD 4850
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 192.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 4850: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 4850 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 110W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 147mm instead of 246mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌184.3% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 30W.
- ❌67.3% longer card at 246mm vs 147mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GT 1010 better than Radeon HD 4850?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 4850 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 11 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 9 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 1010 and Radeon HD 4850

GeForce GT 1010
GeForce GT 1010
The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.

Radeon HD 4850
Radeon HD 4850
The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1010 scores 972 and the Radeon HD 4850 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1010 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 4850 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850). Raw compute: 0.7516 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1010) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 972+3% | 946 |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 800+213% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7516 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | 40+150% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 1010 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 4850 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 1010 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 4850 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GT 1010) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+19% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1010) vs None (Radeon HD 4850). Decoder: VP8 (Feature Set H) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 1010) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4850).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | VP8 (Feature Set H) | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1010 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 4850's 110W — a 114.3% difference. The GeForce GT 1010 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1010) vs 450W (Radeon HD 4850). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 147mm vs 246mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 95.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-73% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 147mm | 246mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-21% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 32.4+277% | 8.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 1010 launched at $70 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199. The GeForce GT 1010 costs 64.8% less ($129 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (GeForce GT 1010) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) — the GeForce GT 1010 offers 189.6% better value. The GeForce GT 1010 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1010 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-65% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9+190% | 4.8 |
| Codename | GP108 | RV770 |
| Release | January 13 2021 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #895 | #876 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












