
Radeon HD 5770

Tesla M2070-Q
Radeon HD 5770 vs Tesla M2070-Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 5770 vs Tesla M2070-Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon HD 5770 vs Tesla M2070-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 5770
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,330 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3463.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 108W instead of 225W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla M2070-Q
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌3352.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,489 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 108W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5770 vs Tesla M2070-Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 5770
The Radeon HD 5770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points. Launch price was $159.

Tesla M2070-Q
The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5770 scores 1,348 and the Tesla M2070-Q reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5770 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 5770) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5770) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,348+3% | 1,306 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+79% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+32% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 896 KB+1020% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5770 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070-Q carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 5770 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5770 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2070-Q. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 5770) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2070-Q) — the Tesla M2070-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5770 draws 108W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon HD 5770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 5770) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W-52% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 208mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.5+116% | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 5770 came in at $159, while the Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5770 was 97.1% cheaper ($5330 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.5 (Radeon HD 5770) vs 0.2 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the Radeon HD 5770 offers 4150% better value. The newer card here is Tesla M2070-Q (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-97% | $5489 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5+4150% | 0.2 |
| Codename | Juniper | GF100 |
| Release | October 13 2009 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #730 | #798 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















