
Radeon HD 5830
Popular choices:

FirePro W600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 5830 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5830 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5830 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5830 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5830 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5830 and FirePro W600

Radeon HD 5830
The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5830 scores 1,726 and the FirePro W600 reaches 1,695 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5830 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro W600 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 512 (FirePro W600). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726+2% | 1,695 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1120+119% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.792 TFLOPS+133% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 128 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5830 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W600 has 2 GB. The FirePro W600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 5830) vs 256 KB (FirePro W600) — the Radeon HD 5830 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 12 (FirePro W600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5830) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.2 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5830 draws 175W versus the FirePro W600's 75W — a 80% difference. The FirePro W600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 5830) vs 350W (FirePro W600). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 75W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 280mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | Unknown |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 22.6+128% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 5830 launched at $239 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro W600 launched at $599 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 57.5 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 56.5 (FirePro W600) — the Radeon HD 5830 offers 1.8% better value. The FirePro W600 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $239-60% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 57.5+2% | 56.5 |
| Codename | Cypress | Cape Verde |
| Release | February 25 2010 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #724 | #732 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













