CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6670
Popular choices:
GRID P4-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6670 is positioned at rank 172 and the GRID P4-1Q is on rank 413, so the Radeon HD 6670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6670 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $99 (vs $185), it costs 46% less, resulting in a 85.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6670 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+85.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($99) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($185) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6670 and GRID P4-1Q
Radeon HD 6670
The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.
GRID P4-1Q
The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6670 scores 725 and the GRID P4-1Q reaches 730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GRID P4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 725 | 730 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+79% |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz | 1178 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 768 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6670 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P4-1Q has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6670 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6670) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6670 draws 250W versus the GRID P4-1Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P4-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 6670) vs 350W (GRID P4-1Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 225W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.9 | 3.2+10% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6670 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the GRID P4-1Q launched at $5890 and now averages $185. The Radeon HD 6670 costs 46.5% less ($86 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.3 (Radeon HD 6670) vs 3.9 (GRID P4-1Q) — the Radeon HD 6670 offers 87.2% better value. The GRID P4-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670 | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-98% | $5890 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99-46% | $185 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.3+87% | 3.9 |
| Codename | Cayman | GM204 |
| Release | December 14 2010 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #596 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6670 and GRID P4-1Q
