Radeon HD 7640G vs Radeon R5 M240

AMD

Radeon HD 7640G

2012Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 7640G vs Radeon R5 M240 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7640G vs Radeon R5 M240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7640G vs Radeon R5 M240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7640G

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 92% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% higher power demand at 45W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 M240

2013

Why buy it

  • 3.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 30W instead of 45W, a 15W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 M240 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (473 vs 454), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7640G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7640G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 92% (9.1 vs 4.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 M240 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 7640G vs Radeon R5 M240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 7640G

The Radeon HD 7640G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 454 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M240

The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7640G scores 454 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7640G is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7640G) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7640G) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240).

FeatureRadeon HD 7640GRadeon R5 M240
G3D Mark Score
454
473+4%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+50%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS+29%
0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24+20%
20
L1 Cache
48 KB
80 KB+67%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7640GRadeon R5 M240
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7640G and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240.

FeatureRadeon HD 7640GRadeon R5 M240
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7640G) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon HD 7640GRadeon R5 M240
DirectX
11 (11_0)
12+9%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7640G) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureRadeon HD 7640GRadeon R5 M240
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3.2
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7640G draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7640G) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 7640GRadeon R5 M240
TDP
45W
30W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
10.1
15.8+56%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7640G came in at $50, while the Radeon R5 M240 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7640G was 50% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (Radeon HD 7640G) vs 4.7 (Radeon R5 M240) — the Radeon HD 7640G offers 93.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M240 (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 7640GRadeon R5 M240
MSRP
$50-50%
$100
Performance per Dollar
9.1+94%
4.7
Codename
Turks
Oland
Release
January 5 2012
October 8 2013
Ranking
#870
#911

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.