G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7770 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7770 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7770

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.7 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 3200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
❌25% longer card at 210mm vs 168mm.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅37.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Radeon HD 7770 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 210mm, a 42mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
25.2% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (2,209 vs 2,173), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.1% (13.7 vs 11.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro WX 3200 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 7770 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 7770

The Radeon HD 7770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,173 points. Launch price was $159.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7770 scores 2,173 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7770 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 7770) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 1.28 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7770) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	Radeon HD 7770	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	2,173	2,209+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.28 TFLOPS	1.385 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	160 KB	160 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7770	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7770 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7770 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3200. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7770) vs 512 KB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 7770	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon HD 7770) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon HD 7770	Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX	12_0	12 (12_0)
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7770) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 7770) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	Radeon HD 7770	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	UVD 3.1	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7770 draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 20.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 7770) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 210mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Radeon HD 7770	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	80W	65W-19%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	210mm	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	—	82°C
Perf/Watt	27.2	34.0+25%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7770 came in at $159, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7770 was 20.1% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.7 (Radeon HD 7770) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the Radeon HD 7770 offers 23.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3200 (2019 vs 2012).

Feature	Radeon HD 7770	Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP	$159-20%	$199
Performance per Dollar	13.7+23%	11.1
Codename	Cape Verde	Polaris 23
Release	February 15 2012	July 2 2019
Ranking	#664	#659

Search Radeon HD 7770 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 3200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.