Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 7770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 7770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 7770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅30.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 7770

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K620 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
6% HIGHER MSRP
$159 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K620 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (2,213 vs 2,173), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $159, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 8% (14.8 vs 13.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro K620 vs Radeon HD 7770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

Radeon HD 7770

The Radeon HD 7770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,173 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the Radeon HD 7770 reaches 2,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7770 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7770). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 1.28 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7770).

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 7770
G3D Mark Score	2,213+2%	2,173
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	1.28 TFLOPS+48%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	192 KB+20%	160 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 7770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K620 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7770. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K620) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7770) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 7770
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 7770's 80W — a 56% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 450W (Radeon HD 7770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 7770
TDP	45W-44%	80W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	210mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	49.2+81%	27.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K620 came in at $150, while the Radeon HD 7770 launched at $159. On MSRP, Quadro K620 was 5.7% cheaper ($9 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Quadro K620) vs 13.7 (Radeon HD 7770) — the Quadro K620 offers 8% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K620 (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K620	Radeon HD 7770
MSRP	$150-6%	$159
Performance per Dollar	14.8+8%	13.7
Codename	GM107	Cape Verde
Release	July 22 2014	February 15 2012
Ranking	#660	#664

Search Quadro K620 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.