Quadro M600M vs Radeon HD 7770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M600M vs Radeon HD 7770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M600M vs Radeon HD 7770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M600M

2015

Why buy it

✅14.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 30W instead of 80W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7770

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌166.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (2,221 vs 2,173), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro M600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M600M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M600M vs Radeon HD 7770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M600M

The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

Radeon HD 7770

The Radeon HD 7770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,173 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M600M scores 2,221 and the Radeon HD 7770 reaches 2,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M600M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7770 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M600M) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7770). Raw compute: 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M) vs 1.28 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7770).

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon HD 7770
G3D Mark Score	2,221+2%	2,173
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6728 TFLOPS	1.28 TFLOPS+90%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	40+150%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon HD 7770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M600M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7770. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M600M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7770) — the Quadro M600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon HD 7770
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M600M) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 7770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon HD 7770
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_0
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro M600M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7770). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M600M) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 7770).

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon HD 7770
Encoder	NVENC 4th Gen	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	UVD 3.1
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M600M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7770's 80W — a 90.9% difference. The Quadro M600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M600M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 7770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon HD 7770
TDP	30W-63%	80W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	210mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	74.0+172%	27.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M600M (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon HD 7770
MSRP	—	$159
Codename	GM107	Cape Verde
Release	August 18 2015	February 15 2012
Ranking	#658	#664

Search Quadro M600M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.