Radeon HD 8330 vs Radeon R5 235X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 8330 vs Radeon R5 235X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 8330 vs Radeon R5 235X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 8330

2010

Why buy it

✅15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2% HIGHER MSRP
$50 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌118.8% higher power demand at 175W vs 80W.

Radeon R5 235X

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 175W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8330 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8330 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 235X instead at 277 vs 275, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 8330 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 235X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2.8% (5.7 vs 5.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 235X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 8330 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 8330 vs Radeon R5 235X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 8330

The Radeon HD 8330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

Radeon R5 235X

The Radeon R5 235X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8330 scores 275 and the Radeon R5 235X reaches 277 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8330 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 235X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 8330) vs 640 (Radeon R5 235X). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8330) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235X).

Feature	Radeon HD 8330	Radeon R5 235X
G3D Mark Score	275	277
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1120+75%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.792 TFLOPS+47%	1.216 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	112 KB	160 KB+43%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 8330	Radeon R5 235X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8330 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 235X carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 235X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8330 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 235X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8330) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 235X) — the Radeon HD 8330 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 8330	Radeon R5 235X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8330 draws 175W versus the Radeon R5 235X's 80W — a 74.5% difference. The Radeon R5 235X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8330) vs 350W (Radeon R5 235X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 8330	Radeon R5 235X
TDP	175W	80W-54%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	1.6	3.5+119%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 8330 came in at $50, while the Radeon R5 235X launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 235X was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (Radeon HD 8330) vs 5.7 (Radeon R5 235X) — the Radeon R5 235X offers 3.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 235X (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	Radeon HD 8330	Radeon R5 235X
MSRP	$50	$49-2%
Performance per Dollar	5.5	5.7+4%
Codename	Cypress	Cape Verde
Release	February 25 2010	February 13 2014
Ranking	#724	#655

Search Radeon HD 8330 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 235X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.