Radeon HD 8330 vs Radeon R5 235X
Radeon HD 8330
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 235X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8330 is positioned at rank 213 and the Radeon R5 235X is on rank 209, so the Radeon R5 235X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8330
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 235X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 235X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8330.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8330 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8330 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8330 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 48.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8330 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+48.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8330 and Radeon R5 235X
Radeon HD 8330
The Radeon HD 8330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.
Radeon R5 235X
The Radeon R5 235X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8330 scores 275 and the Radeon R5 235X reaches 277 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8330 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 235X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 8330) vs 640 (Radeon R5 235X). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8330) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8330 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 275 | 277 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1120+75% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.792 TFLOPS+47% | 1.216 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 160 KB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8330 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8330 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 235X has 1 GB. The Radeon R5 235X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8330) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 235X) — the Radeon HD 8330 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8330 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8330 draws 175W versus the Radeon R5 235X's 80W — a 74.5% difference. The Radeon R5 235X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8330) vs 350W (Radeon R5 235X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8330 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 80W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6 | 3.5+119% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8330 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon R5 235X launched at $49 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 8330 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.5 (Radeon HD 8330) vs 18.5 (Radeon R5 235X) — the Radeon HD 8330 offers 48.6% better value. The Radeon R5 235X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8330 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $49-2% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5+49% | 18.5 |
| Codename | Cypress | Cape Verde |
| Release | February 25 2010 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #724 | #655 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8330 and Radeon R5 235X
