CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Popular choices:
GRID M10-0B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is positioned at rank 313 and the GRID M10-0B is on rank 403, so the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID M10-0B remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8500M/8700M and GRID M10-0B
Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 853 points.
GRID M10-0B
The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M scores 853 and the GRID M10-0B reaches 871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M10-0B uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 640 (GRID M10-0B). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 853 | 871+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+69% |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1306 MHz+69% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-0B) — the GRID M10-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M draws 50W versus the GRID M10-0B's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 350W (GRID M10-0B). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.1+338% | 3.9 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-0B is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $4000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1000 |
| Codename | Venus | GM107 |
| Release | April 1 2013 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #745 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8500M/8700M and GRID M10-0B
