Radeon HD 8500M/8700M vs HD Graphics 6000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is positioned at rank #313 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

98%

#303

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

764%

#305

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

692%

#306

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

690%

#310

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

628%

#311

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

623%

#313

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#314

GeForce GT 720A

MSRP: $40|Avg: $40

100%

#315

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

100%

#320

GeForce 940A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

97%

#323

Radeon RX 640

MSRP: $159|Avg: $55

96%

#326

Iris Pro Graphics P580

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

95%

#327

Radeon E8870PCIe

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The HD Graphics 6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M	HD Graphics 6000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the HD Graphics 6000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M Benchmark Check

HD Graphics 6000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8500M/8700M and HD Graphics 6000

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 853 points.

HD Graphics 6000

The HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 873 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M scores 853 and the HD Graphics 6000 reaches 873 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is built on GCN 1.0 while the HD Graphics 6000 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 384 (HD Graphics 6000). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 6000). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 950 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M	HD Graphics 6000
G3D Mark Score	853	873+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 8.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.992 TFLOPS+36%	0.7296 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	775 MHz	950 MHz+23%
ROPs	16+167%	6
TMUs	40	48+20%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M	HD Graphics 6000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 6000 has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M	HD Graphics 6000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M draws 50W versus the HD Graphics 6000's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The HD Graphics 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 1W (HD Graphics 6000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.