
Radeon HD 8770 vs Radeon HD 6950

Radeon HD 8770
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8770 is positioned at rank #271 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8770
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6950.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (275mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6950 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6950 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 49.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+49.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8770 and Radeon HD 6950

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

Radeon HD 6950
The Radeon HD 6950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,593 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8770 scores 2,607 and the Radeon HD 6950 reaches 2,593 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8770 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6950 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6950). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6950). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,607 | 2,593 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1408+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 2.253 TFLOPS+256% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz+3% | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 88+267% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 352 KB+267% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8770 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6950 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 8770 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6950) — the Radeon HD 6950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 11_2 (Radeon HD 6950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0+9% | 11_2 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6950). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8770 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 6950's 200W — a 120% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8770) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6950). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-75% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 275mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1+301% | 13.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon HD 6950 launched at $299 and now averages $100. The Radeon HD 6950 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 25.9 (Radeon HD 6950) — the Radeon HD 6950 offers 48.9% better value. The Radeon HD 8770 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.4 | 25.9+49% |
| Codename | Mars | Cayman |
| Release | April 1 2013 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #844 | #623 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















