
Radeon HD 8770
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 950A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8770 is positioned at rank 271 and the GeForce GTX 950A is on rank 286, so the Radeon HD 8770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8770
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 950A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950A.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8770 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 398.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8770 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+398.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8770 and GeForce GTX 950A

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

GeForce GTX 950A
The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8770 scores 2,607 and the GeForce GTX 950A reaches 2,599 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8770 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 950A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950A). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,607 | 2,599 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 1.439 TFLOPS+127% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1124 MHz+36% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 320 KB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (Radeon HD 8770) vs 32 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950A) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon HD 8770. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8770) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s+200% | 32 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8770 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 950A's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8770) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950A). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1+50% | 34.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 950A launched at $159 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 950A costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 86.6 (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 397.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 950A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-6% | $159 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $30-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.4 | 86.6+398% |
| Codename | Mars | GM107 |
| Release | April 1 2013 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #844 | #621 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















