
Radeon HD 8870M vs Radeon R9 M275X

Radeon HD 8870M
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M275X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8870M is positioned at rank 241 and the Radeon R9 M275X is on rank 460, so the Radeon HD 8870M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8870M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8870M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M275X.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8870M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8870M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8870M and Radeon R9 M275X

Radeon HD 8870M
The Radeon HD 8870M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,638 points.

Radeon R9 M275X
The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8870M scores 1,638 and the Radeon R9 M275X reaches 1,631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8870M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M275X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8870M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8870M) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8870M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,638 | 1,631 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 925 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8870M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8870M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 8870M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8870M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (Radeon HD 8870M) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8870M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12_0+8% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8870M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8870M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8870M draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M275X's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8870M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8870M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8870M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.8+51% | 21.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M275X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8870M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $300 |
| Codename | Venus | Venus |
| Release | April 1 2013 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #745 | #746 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















