
Radeon E8860
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8870M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon E8860
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 50W, a 13W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 8870M
2013Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌35.1% higher power demand at 50W vs 37W.
Radeon E8860
2014Radeon HD 8870M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 50W, a 13W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌35.1% higher power demand at 50W vs 37W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon E8860 better than Radeon HD 8870M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 8870M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E8860 and Radeon HD 8870M

Radeon E8860
Radeon E8860
The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.

Radeon HD 8870M
Radeon HD 8870M
The Radeon HD 8870M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,638 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E8860 scores 1,686 and the Radeon HD 8870M reaches 1,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E8860 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8870M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon E8860) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8870M). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8870M). Boost clocks: 625 MHz vs 775 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,686+3% | 1,638 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8 TFLOPS | 0.992 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | 775 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon E8860 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8870M has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8870M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E8860 draws 37W versus the Radeon HD 8870M's 50W — a 29.9% difference. The Radeon E8860 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E8860) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8870M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 37W-26% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 45.6+39% | 32.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E8860 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Codename | Venus | Venus |
| Release | January 25 2014 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #734 | #745 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













