Quadro P400 vs Radeon HD 8870M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P400 vs Radeon HD 8870M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P400 vs Radeon HD 8870M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P400

2017

Why buy it

✅15.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8870M

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P400 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,659 vs 1,638), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro P400 vs Radeon HD 8870M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P400

The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

Radeon HD 8870M

The Radeon HD 8870M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,638 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P400 scores 1,659 and the Radeon HD 8870M reaches 1,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P400 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 8870M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P400) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8870M). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8870M). Boost clocks: 1252 MHz vs 775 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon HD 8870M
G3D Mark Score	1,659+1%	1,638
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	640+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.641 TFLOPS	0.992 TFLOPS+55%
Boost Clock	1252 MHz+62%	775 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	16	40+150%
L1 Cache	96 KB	160 KB+67%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon HD 8870M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P400 and System on the Radeon HD 8870M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro P400) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8870M) — the Quadro P400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon HD 8870M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P400) vs 11.1 (Radeon HD 8870M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon HD 8870M
DirectX	12_1+8%	11.1
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8870M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 3.0.

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon HD 8870M
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	UVD 3.0
Codecs	—	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P400 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 8870M's 50W — a 50% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8870M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon HD 8870M
TDP	30W-40%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	55.3+69%	32.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P400 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon HD 8870M
MSRP	$169	—
Codename	GP107	Venus
Release	February 7 2017	April 1 2013
Ranking	#741	#745

Search Quadro P400 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8870M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.