
Quadro P400 vs Radeon HD 8870M

Quadro P400
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8870M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P400 is positioned at rank 143 and the Radeon HD 8870M is on rank 241, so the Quadro P400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8870M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8870M.
| Insight | Quadro P400 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P400 and Radeon HD 8870M

Quadro P400
The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

Radeon HD 8870M
The Radeon HD 8870M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,638 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P400 scores 1,659 and the Radeon HD 8870M reaches 1,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P400 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 8870M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P400) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8870M). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8870M). Boost clocks: 1252 MHz vs 775 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,659+1% | 1,638 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 640+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.641 TFLOPS | 0.992 TFLOPS+55% |
| Boost Clock | 1252 MHz+62% | 775 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | 40+150% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 160 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro P400) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8870M) — the Quadro P400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P400) vs 11.1 (Radeon HD 8870M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+8% | 11.1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8870M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 3.0.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P400 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 8870M's 50W — a 50% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8870M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.3+69% | 32.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | — |
| Codename | GP107 | Venus |
| Release | February 7 2017 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #741 | #745 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















