Quadro P400 vs Radeon E8860

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P400 vs Radeon E8860 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P400 vs Radeon E8860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P400

2017

Why buy it

✅22.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 74.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.8 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 37W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon E8860

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
77.5% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 9.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P400 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon E8860 instead at 1,686 vs 1,659, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $131 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 74.7% (9.8 vs 5.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro P400 vs Radeon E8860 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P400

The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

Radeon E8860

The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P400 scores 1,659 and the Radeon E8860 reaches 1,686 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P400 is built on Pascal while the Radeon E8860 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P400) vs 640 (Radeon E8860). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860). Boost clocks: 1252 MHz vs 625 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon E8860
G3D Mark Score	1,659	1,686+2%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	640+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.641 TFLOPS	0.8 TFLOPS+25%
Boost Clock	1252 MHz+100%	625 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	16	40+150%
L1 Cache	96 KB	160 KB+67%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon E8860
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P400 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8860 carries 512 MB. Quadro P400 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P400 and 64-bit on the Radeon E8860. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro P400) vs 256 KB (Radeon E8860) — the Quadro P400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon E8860
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P400 draws 30W versus the Radeon E8860's 37W — a 20.9% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P400) vs 350W (Radeon E8860). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon E8860
TDP	30W-19%	37W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	55.3+21%	45.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P400 came in at $169, while the Radeon E8860 launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro P400 was 43.7% cheaper ($131 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.8 (Quadro P400) vs 5.6 (Radeon E8860) — the Quadro P400 offers 75% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P400 (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro P400	Radeon E8860
MSRP	$169-44%	$300
Performance per Dollar	9.8+75%	5.6
Codename	GP107	Venus
Release	February 7 2017	January 25 2014
Ranking	#741	#734

Search Quadro P400 on Amazon

Search Radeon E8860 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.