Quadro 5010M vs Quadro P400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 5010M vs Quadro P400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 5010M vs Quadro P400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 5010M

2011

Why buy it

✅48.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Quadro P400

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 5010M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 5010M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 48.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (1,691 vs 1,659), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 5010M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 5010M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 5010M vs Quadro P400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 5010M

The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

Quadro P400

The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the Quadro P400 reaches 1,659 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro P400 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 256 (Quadro P400). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400).

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Quadro P400
G3D Mark Score	1,691+2%	1,659
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384+50%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS+8%	0.641 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+200%	16
L1 Cache	768 KB+700%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Quadro P400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5010M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P400 carries 2 GB. Quadro 5010M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 5010M and 64-bit on the Quadro P400.

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Quadro P400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the Quadro P400's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 350W (Quadro P400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Quadro P400
TDP	100W	30W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	145mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	16.9	55.3+227%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P400 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Quadro P400
MSRP	—	$169
Codename	GF110	GP107
Release	February 22 2011	February 7 2017
Ranking	#733	#741

Search Quadro 5010M on Amazon

Search Quadro P400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.