Quadro 5010M vs Radeon HD 7750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 5010M is positioned at rank #19 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5010M

#4

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

262%

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

62%

#19

Quadro 5010M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

79%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

71%

#33

Radeon PRO W6400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $200

65%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 5010M.

Insight	Quadro 5010M	Radeon HD 7750
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 5010M Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 7750 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5010M and Radeon HD 7750

Quadro 5010M

The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

Radeon HD 7750

The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750).

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Radeon HD 7750
G3D Mark Score	1,691	1,703
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS+19%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+50%	32
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Radeon HD 7750
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 5010M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7750) — the Quadro 5010M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Radeon HD 7750
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 58.1% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.