GeForce GT 755M vs Quadro 5010M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 755M is positioned at rank 4 and the Quadro 5010M is on rank 19, so the GeForce GT 755M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M

#4

GeForce GT 755M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

94%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

86%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

85%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

78%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

77%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5010M

#4

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

262%

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

62%

#19

Quadro 5010M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

79%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

71%

#33

Radeon PRO W6400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $200

65%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 755M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 5010M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 755M	Quadro 5010M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 755M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 755M Benchmark Check

Quadro 5010M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M and Quadro 5010M

GeForce GT 755M

The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Quadro 5010M

The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the Quadro 5010M reaches 1,691 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the Quadro 5010M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 384 (Quadro 5010M). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Quadro 5010M
G3D Mark Score	1,726+2%	1,691
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7526 TFLOPS+9%	0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	32 KB	768 KB+2300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Quadro 5010M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5010M has 4 GB. The Quadro 5010M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 755M) vs 512 KB (Quadro 5010M) — the Quadro 5010M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M	Quadro 5010M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the Quadro 5010M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GT 755M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 350W (Quadro 5010M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.