Quadro 5010M vs Radeon HD 6900M

NVIDIA

Quadro 5010M

2011Core: 450 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6900M

2011Core: 680 MHz

Quadro 5010M vs Radeon HD 6900M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 5010M vs Radeon HD 6900M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 5010M vs Radeon HD 6900M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 5010M

2011

Why buy it

  • 12.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon HD 6900M

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 5010M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 5010M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6900M instead at 1,707 vs 1,691, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 5010M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 5010M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro 5010M vs Radeon HD 6900M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 5010M

The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6900M

The Radeon HD 6900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,707 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the Radeon HD 6900M reaches 1,707 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6900M uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6900M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6900M).

FeatureQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 6900M
G3D Mark Score
1,691
1,707
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
960+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+89%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
48
L1 Cache
768 KB+300%
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 6900M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5010M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6900M carries 512 MB. Quadro 5010M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 5010M and System on the Radeon HD 6900M.

FeatureQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 6900M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6900M's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon HD 6900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6900M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 6900M
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
16.9
22.8+35%