Quadro 5010M vs Radeon HD 5830

NVIDIA

Quadro 5010M

2011Core: 450 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5830

2010Core: 800 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro 5010M

2011

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 175W, a 75W reduction.
  • More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $239 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5830

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 75% higher power demand at 175W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon HD 5830 better than Quadro 5010M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,691 vs 1,726 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon HD 5830 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 5010M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 1 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon HD 5830 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $239 MSRP. Radeon HD 5830 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon HD 5830 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $239 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.1% higher G3D Mark. Quadro 5010M is the newer 2011 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (100W vs 175W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Quadro 5010M make more sense than Radeon HD 5830?
Yes. Quadro 5010M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (100W vs 175W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon HD 5830. The trade-off is that Radeon HD 5830 currently gives you 2.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 5830
1080p
low76 FPS47 FPS
medium61 FPS29 FPS
high51 FPS20 FPS
ultra33 FPS10 FPS
1440p
low57 FPS31 FPS
medium46 FPS19 FPS
high38 FPS10 FPS
ultra23 FPS5 FPS
4K
low24 FPS11 FPS
medium23 FPS7 FPS
high14 FPS4 FPS
ultra12 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 5830
1080p
low76 FPS51 FPS
medium60 FPS29 FPS
high49 FPS20 FPS
ultra38 FPS13 FPS
1440p
low48 FPS24 FPS
medium34 FPS14 FPS
high25 FPS9 FPS
ultra19 FPS7 FPS
4K
low22 FPS6 FPS
medium16 FPS4 FPS
high12 FPS3 FPS
ultra9 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 5830
1080p
low76 FPS78 FPS
medium61 FPS62 FPS
high51 FPS52 FPS
ultra38 FPS39 FPS
1440p
low57 FPS58 FPS
medium46 FPS47 FPS
high38 FPS39 FPS
ultra29 FPS29 FPS
4K
low38 FPS39 FPS
medium30 FPS31 FPS
high25 FPS26 FPS
ultra19 FPS19 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 5830
1080p
low76 FPS78 FPS
medium61 FPS62 FPS
high49 FPS52 FPS
ultra38 FPS39 FPS
1440p
low14 FPS58 FPS
medium11 FPS47 FPS
high10 FPS39 FPS
ultra8 FPS29 FPS
4K
low10 FPS39 FPS
medium7 FPS31 FPS
high6 FPS26 FPS
ultra5 FPS19 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5010M and Radeon HD 5830

NVIDIA

Quadro 5010M

The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 5830

The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the Radeon HD 5830 reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 5830 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830).

FeatureQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 5830
G3D Mark Score
1,691
1,726+2%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1120+192%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS+159%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
48
56+17%
L1 Cache
768 KB+586%
112 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 5830
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5010M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5830 has 1 GB. The Quadro 5010M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 5830
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+300%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 5830's 175W — a 54.5% difference. The Quadro 5010M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5830). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 5830
TDP
100W-43%
175W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
280mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
16.9+71%
9.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro 5010M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureQuadro 5010MRadeon HD 5830
MSRP
$239
Codename
GF110
Cypress
Release
February 22 2011
February 25 2010
Ranking
#733
#724