
Quadro 5010M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5830
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro 5010M
2011Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 175W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5830
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌75% higher power demand at 175W vs 100W.
Quadro 5010M
2011Radeon HD 5830
2010Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 175W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌75% higher power demand at 175W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 5830 better than Quadro 5010M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro 5010M make more sense than Radeon HD 5830?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 19 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5010M and Radeon HD 5830

Quadro 5010M
Quadro 5010M
The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

Radeon HD 5830
Radeon HD 5830
The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the Radeon HD 5830 reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 5830 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830).
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,691 | 1,726+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1120+192% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS+159% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+586% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 5010M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5830 has 1 GB. The Quadro 5010M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 5830's 175W — a 54.5% difference. The Quadro 5010M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5830). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-43% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 280mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.9+71% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 5010M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $239 |
| Codename | GF110 | Cypress |
| Release | February 22 2011 | February 25 2010 |
| Ranking | #733 | #724 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













