Quadro P400 vs Radeon R9 M275X

NVIDIA

Quadro P400

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1252 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M275X

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P400 vs Radeon R9 M275X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P400 vs Radeon R9 M275X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P400 vs Radeon R9 M275X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P400

2017

Why buy it

  • 17.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 80.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R9 M275X

2014

Why buy it

  • Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 77.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 9.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P400 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (1,659 vs 1,631), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $131 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 80.6% (9.8 vs 5.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro P400 vs Radeon R9 M275X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P400

The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

AMD

Radeon R9 M275X

The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P400 scores 1,659 and the Radeon R9 M275X reaches 1,631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P400 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M275X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P400) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X). Boost clocks: 1252 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P400Radeon R9 M275X
G3D Mark Score
1,659+2%
1,631
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
640+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.641 TFLOPS
1.184 TFLOPS+85%
Boost Clock
1252 MHz+35%
925 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
16
40+150%
L1 Cache
96 KB
160 KB+67%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P400Radeon R9 M275X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P400 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X carries 512 MB. Quadro P400 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P400 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro P400) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X) — the Quadro P400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P400Radeon R9 M275X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P400) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureQuadro P400Radeon R9 M275X
DirectX
12_1
12_0
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureQuadro P400Radeon R9 M275X
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th Gen
UVD 4.2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P400 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M275X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P400) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQuadro P400Radeon R9 M275X
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
145mm
1mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Perf/Watt
55.3+155%
21.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P400 came in at $169, while the Radeon R9 M275X launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro P400 was 43.7% cheaper ($131 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.8 (Quadro P400) vs 5.4 (Radeon R9 M275X) — the Quadro P400 offers 81.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P400 (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureQuadro P400Radeon R9 M275X
MSRP
$169-44%
$300
Performance per Dollar
9.8+81%
5.4
Codename
GP107
Venus
Release
February 7 2017
January 28 2014
Ranking
#741
#746

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.