
Quadro P400

Radeon R9 M275X
Quadro P400 vs Radeon R9 M275X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P400 vs Radeon R9 M275X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P400 vs Radeon R9 M275X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P400
2017Why buy it
- ✅17.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M275X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌77.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 9.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P400 vs Radeon R9 M275X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P400
The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

Radeon R9 M275X
The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P400 scores 1,659 and the Radeon R9 M275X reaches 1,631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P400 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M275X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P400) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X). Boost clocks: 1252 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,659+2% | 1,631 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 640+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.641 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+85% |
| Boost Clock | 1252 MHz+35% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | 40+150% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 160 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P400 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X carries 512 MB. Quadro P400 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P400 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro P400) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X) — the Quadro P400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P400) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | UVD 4.2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P400 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M275X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P400) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.3+155% | 21.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P400 came in at $169, while the Radeon R9 M275X launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro P400 was 43.7% cheaper ($131 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.8 (Quadro P400) vs 5.4 (Radeon R9 M275X) — the Quadro P400 offers 81.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P400 (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-44% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.8+81% | 5.4 |
| Codename | GP107 | Venus |
| Release | February 7 2017 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #741 | #746 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















