
Quadro 5010M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8870M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro 5010M
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8870M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quadro 5010M
2011Radeon HD 8870M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro 5010M better than Radeon HD 8870M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 8870M make more sense than Quadro 5010M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5010M and Radeon HD 8870M

Quadro 5010M
Quadro 5010M
The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

Radeon HD 8870M
Radeon HD 8870M
The Radeon HD 8870M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,638 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the Radeon HD 8870M reaches 1,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8870M uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8870M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8870M).
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,691+3% | 1,638 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.992 TFLOPS+44% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+380% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 5010M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8870M has 2 GB. The Quadro 5010M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 5010M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8870M) — the Quadro 5010M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 8870M's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8870M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8870M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.9 | 32.8+94% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













