
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 670

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is positioned at rank #264 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 670.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $75), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 265.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+265.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and GeForce GTX 670

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

GeForce GTX 670
The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire scores 5,500 and the GeForce GTX 670 reaches 5,361 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is built on GCN while the GeForce GTX 670 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500+3% | 5,361 |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+90% | 1344 |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 980 MHz+9% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 670) — a 25% advantage for the GeForce GTX 670. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s x2 | 192 GB/s+25% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2 | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 670's 170W — a 16.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 670). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 170W-15% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82 C |
| Perf/Watt | 27.5 | 31.5+15% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce GTX 670 launched at $399 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTX 670 costs 73.3% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 73.3 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) vs 268.1 (GeForce GTX 670) — the GeForce GTX 670 offers 265.8% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire | GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-25% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | $20-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.3 | 268.1+266% |
| Codename | Neptune CF | GK104 |
| Release | May 1 2012 | May 10 2012 |
| Ranking | #350 | #424 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















