RADEON HD6370D vs Radeon R5E
RADEON HD6370D
Popular choices:
Radeon R5E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON HD6370D is positioned at rank #193 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6370D
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON HD6370D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5E.
| Insight | RADEON HD6370D | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON HD6370D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the RADEON HD6370D holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $49), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 397.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON HD6370D | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+397.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON HD6370D and Radeon R5E
RADEON HD6370D
The RADEON HD6370D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $369.
Radeon R5E
The Radeon R5E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 315 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON HD6370D scores 320 and the Radeon R5E reaches 315 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON HD6370D is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R5E uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (RADEON HD6370D) vs 512 (Radeon R5E). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6370D) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R5E).
| Feature | RADEON HD6370D | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 320+2% | 315 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+200% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+230% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON HD6370D | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON HD6370D) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5E) — the RADEON HD6370D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON HD6370D | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON HD6370D draws 250W versus the Radeon R5E's 15W — a 177.4% difference. The Radeon R5E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6370D) vs 0W (Radeon R5E). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.
| Feature | RADEON HD6370D | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 15W-94% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3 | 21.0+1515% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON HD6370D launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon R5E launched at $0 and now averages $49. The RADEON HD6370D costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.0 (RADEON HD6370D) vs 6.4 (Radeon R5E) — the RADEON HD6370D offers 400% better value. The Radeon R5E is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON HD6370D | Radeon R5E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0+400% | 6.4 |
| Codename | Cayman | Cape Verde |
| Release | December 14 2010 | December 20 2013 |
| Ranking | #596 | #738 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON HD6370D and Radeon R5E
