Radeon E6460 vs RADEON HD6370D

AMD

Radeon E6460

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON HD6370D

2010Boost: 880 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon E6460 vs RADEON HD6370D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon E6460 vs RADEON HD6370D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon E6460 vs RADEON HD6370D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon E6460

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 250W, a 205W reduction.
  • More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RADEON HD6370D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

RADEON HD6370D

2010

Why buy it

  • 17.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 196.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 455.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON HD6370D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon E6460 instead at 324 vs 320, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon E6460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON HD6370D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 196.3% (6.4 vs 2.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON HD6370D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon E6460 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon E6460 vs RADEON HD6370D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon E6460

The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.

AMD

RADEON HD6370D

The RADEON HD6370D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $369.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E6460 scores 324 and the RADEON HD6370D reaches 320 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6460 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON HD6370D uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6460) vs 1,536 (RADEON HD6370D).

FeatureRadeon E6460RADEON HD6370D
G3D Mark Score
324+1%
320
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 3
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
480
1536+220%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
96+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon E6460RADEON HD6370D
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon E6460 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6370D.

FeatureRadeon E6460RADEON HD6370D
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E6460 draws 45W versus the RADEON HD6370D's 250W — a 139% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6460) vs 350W (RADEON HD6370D). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon E6460RADEON HD6370D
TDP
45W-82%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Perf/Watt
7.2+454%
1.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon E6460 came in at $150, while the RADEON HD6370D launched at $50. On MSRP, RADEON HD6370D was 66.7% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (Radeon E6460) vs 6.4 (RADEON HD6370D) — the RADEON HD6370D offers 190.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon E6460 (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon E6460RADEON HD6370D
MSRP
$150
$50-67%
Performance per Dollar
2.2
6.4+191%
Codename
Turks
Cayman
Release
May 2 2011
December 14 2010
Ranking
#923
#596

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.