Radeon E6460 vs RADEON HD6370D
Radeon E6460
Popular choices:
RADEON HD6370D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon E6460 is positioned at rank 312 and the RADEON HD6370D is on rank 193, so the RADEON HD6370D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon E6460
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6370D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon E6460 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON HD6370D.
| Insight | Radeon E6460 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON HD6370D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the RADEON HD6370D holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $40), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 295.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon E6460 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+295.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6460 and RADEON HD6370D
Radeon E6460
The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.
RADEON HD6370D
The RADEON HD6370D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E6460 scores 324 and the RADEON HD6370D reaches 320 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6460 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON HD6370D uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6460) vs 1,536 (RADEON HD6370D).
| Feature | Radeon E6460 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 324+1% | 320 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1536+220% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 96+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E6460 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E6460 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E6460 draws 45W versus the RADEON HD6370D's 250W — a 139% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6460) vs 350W (RADEON HD6370D). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon E6460 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-82% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 7.2+454% | 1.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E6460 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the RADEON HD6370D launched at $50 and now averages $10. The RADEON HD6370D costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon E6460) vs 32.0 (RADEON HD6370D) — the RADEON HD6370D offers 295.1% better value. The Radeon E6460 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon E6460 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $50-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $10-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 32.0+295% |
| Codename | Turks | Cayman |
| Release | May 2 2011 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #923 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon E6460 and RADEON HD6370D
