Radeon E6460 vs Radeon R5 310
Radeon E6460
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon E6460 is positioned at rank 312 and the Radeon R5 310 is on rank 424, so the Radeon E6460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon E6460
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R5 310 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon R5 310 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon E6460 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E6460.
| Insight | Radeon E6460 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 173.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon E6460 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+173.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6460 and Radeon R5 310
Radeon E6460
The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Radeon R5 310
The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E6460 scores 324 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6460 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6460) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310).
| Feature | Radeon E6460 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 324 | 332+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E6460 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E6460 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E6460 draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6460) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon E6460 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-10% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 7.2+9% | 6.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E6460 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The Radeon R5 310 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon E6460) vs 22.1 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 172.8% better value. The Radeon R5 310 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon E6460 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $49-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $15-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 22.1+173% |
| Codename | Turks | Weston |
| Release | May 2 2011 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #923 | #873 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon E6460 and Radeon R5 310
