Radeon E6460 vs Radeon R5 310

AMD

Radeon E6460

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 310

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon E6460 vs Radeon R5 310 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon E6460 vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon E6460 vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon E6460

2011

Why buy it

  • 13.9% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 206.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $101 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 213.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon E6460 across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon E6460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.9% in average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 310 instead at 332 vs 324, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon E6460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 213.7% (6.8 vs 2.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon E6460 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon E6460 vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon E6460

The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.

AMD

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E6460 scores 324 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6460 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6460) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310).

FeatureRadeon E6460Radeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score
324
332+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+25%
384
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon E6460Radeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon E6460 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310.

FeatureRadeon E6460Radeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E6460 draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6460) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon E6460Radeon R5 310
TDP
45W-10%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
7.2+9%
6.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon E6460 came in at $150, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 310 was 67.3% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (Radeon E6460) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 209.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon E6460Radeon R5 310
MSRP
$150
$49-67%
Performance per Dollar
2.2
6.8+209%
Codename
Turks
Weston
Release
May 2 2011
April 18 2017
Ranking
#923
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.