GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon E6460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon E6460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon E6460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 520

2015

Why buy it

✅13.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 153.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 90W vs 45W.

Radeon E6460

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 90W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 520 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
154.2% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 520 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon E6460 instead at 324 vs 323, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $91 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 153.5% (5.5 vs 2.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon E6460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 520

The GeForce GT 520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $159.

Radeon E6460

The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 520 scores 323 and the Radeon E6460 reaches 324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon E6460 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 520) vs 480 (Radeon E6460).

Feature	GeForce GT 520	Radeon E6460
G3D Mark Score	323	324
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	768+60%	480
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	48+100%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 520 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E6460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 520	Radeon E6460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6460 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 520 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 520 and 64-bit on the Radeon E6460.

Feature	GeForce GT 520	Radeon E6460
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 520 draws 90W versus the Radeon E6460's 45W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 520) vs 350W (Radeon E6460). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	GeForce GT 520	Radeon E6460
TDP	90W	45W-50%
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.6	7.2+100%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 520 came in at $59, while the Radeon E6460 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GT 520 was 60.7% cheaper ($91 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GT 520) vs 2.2 (Radeon E6460) — the GeForce GT 520 offers 150% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 520 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GT 520	Radeon E6460
MSRP	$59-61%	$150
Performance per Dollar	5.5+150%	2.2
Codename	GM206	Turks
Release	August 20 2015	May 2 2011
Ranking	#425	#923

Search GeForce GT 520 on Amazon

Search Radeon E6460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.