GeForce 605 vs GeForce GT 520
GeForce 605
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 605 is positioned at rank 115 and the GeForce GT 520 is on rank 214, so the GeForce 605 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 605
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 520
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 605 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 520 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 605 | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 520 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 520 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 95.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 605 | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 605 and GeForce GT 520
GeForce 605
The GeForce 605 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $99.
GeForce GT 520
The GeForce GT 520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 605 scores 330 and the GeForce GT 520 reaches 323 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 605 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 520 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 605) vs 768 (GeForce GT 520). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce 605) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520).
| Feature | GeForce 605 | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 330+2% | 323 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 1.825 TFLOPS+163% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 288 KB+800% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 605 | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 605 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 520 has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 520 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce 605) vs 1 MB (GeForce GT 520) — the GeForce GT 520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 605 | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 605) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 520). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 605 | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 605) vs No (GeForce GT 520). Decoder: VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 605) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520).
| Feature | GeForce 605 | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | VP5 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 605 draws 65W versus the GeForce GT 520's 90W — a 32.3% difference. The GeForce 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce 605) vs 250W (GeForce GT 520). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 605 | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-28% | 90W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W | 250W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 145mm | 145mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1+42% | 3.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 605 launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GT 520 launched at $59 and now averages $15. The GeForce GT 520 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.0 (GeForce 605) vs 21.5 (GeForce GT 520) — the GeForce GT 520 offers 95.5% better value. The GeForce GT 520 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 605 | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-49% | $59 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $15-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.0 | 21.5+95% |
| Codename | GK107 | GM206 |
| Release | June 5 2012 | August 20 2015 |
| Ranking | #837 | #425 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 605 and GeForce GT 520
