GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R5 310

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520

2015Core: 1024 MHzBoost: 1188 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 310

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R5 310 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 520

2015

Why buy it

  • 36.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 20.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $59 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 80% higher power demand at 90W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $10 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • Delivers 23.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 90W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 520 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 520 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 310 instead at 332 vs 323, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $59, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.8% (6.8 vs 5.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 520 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520

The GeForce GT 520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $159.

AMD

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 520 scores 323 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 520) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 520Radeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score
323
332+3%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+100%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.825 TFLOPS+132%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1188 MHz+16%
1024 MHz
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
48+100%
24
L1 Cache
288 KB+200%
96 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 520 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 520Radeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 310 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 520 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 520 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GT 520) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 310) — the GeForce GT 520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 520Radeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 520 draws 90W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 520) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 520Radeon R5 310
TDP
90W
50W-44%
Recommended PSU
250W-29%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
3.6
6.6+83%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 520 came in at $59, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 310 was 16.9% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GT 520) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 23.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GT 520Radeon R5 310
MSRP
$59
$49-17%
Performance per Dollar
5.5
6.8+24%
Codename
GM206
Weston
Release
August 20 2015
April 18 2017
Ranking
#425
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.