
GeForce GT 520

Radeon R5 310
GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R5 310 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 520
2015Why buy it
- ✅36.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌20.4% HIGHER MSRP$59 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 90W vs 50W.
Radeon R5 310
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 90W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 520 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 520
The GeForce GT 520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $159.

Radeon R5 310
The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 520 scores 323 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 520) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 323 | 332+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS+132% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz+16% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+200% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+669% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 520 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 310 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 520 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 520 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GT 520) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 310) — the GeForce GT 520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+669% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 520 draws 90W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 520) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 50W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6 | 6.6+83% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 520 came in at $59, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 310 was 16.9% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GT 520) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 23.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | Radeon R5 310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59 | $49-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 6.8+24% |
| Codename | GM206 | Weston |
| Release | August 20 2015 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #425 | #873 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














