
GeForce GT 520

RADEON HD6370D
GeForce GT 520 vs RADEON HD6370D Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 520 vs RADEON HD6370D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 520 vs RADEON HD6370D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 520
2015Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 250W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RADEON HD6370D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌18% HIGHER MSRP$59 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
RADEON HD6370D
2010Why buy it
- ✅3.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 250W vs 90W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 520 vs RADEON HD6370D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 520
The GeForce GT 520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $159.

RADEON HD6370D
The RADEON HD6370D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 520 scores 323 and the RADEON HD6370D reaches 320 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RADEON HD6370D uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 520) vs 1,536 (RADEON HD6370D). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6370D). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 323 | 320 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz+35% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 96+100% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+50% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 520 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON HD6370D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6370D carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 520 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 520 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6370D. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GT 520) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON HD6370D) — the GeForce GT 520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 520 draws 90W versus the RADEON HD6370D's 250W — a 94.1% difference. The GeForce GT 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 520) vs 350W (RADEON HD6370D). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-64% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6+177% | 1.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 520 came in at $59, while the RADEON HD6370D launched at $50. On MSRP, RADEON HD6370D was 15.3% cheaper ($9 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GT 520) vs 6.4 (RADEON HD6370D) — the RADEON HD6370D offers 16.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 520 (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520 | RADEON HD6370D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59 | $50-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 6.4+16% |
| Codename | GM206 | Cayman |
| Release | August 20 2015 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #425 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














