GeForce 605 vs RADEON HD6370D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 605 vs RADEON HD6370D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 605 vs RADEON HD6370D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 605

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON HD6370D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON HD6370D

2010

Why buy it

✅44.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
66.7% HIGHER MSRP
$50 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON HD6370D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 44.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 605 instead at 330 vs 320, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 605 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 605 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 71.9% (11.0 vs 6.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RADEON HD6370D still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 605 vs RADEON HD6370D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 605

The GeForce 605 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $99.

RADEON HD6370D

The RADEON HD6370D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 605 scores 330 and the RADEON HD6370D reaches 320 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 605 is built on Kepler while the RADEON HD6370D uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 605) vs 1,536 (RADEON HD6370D). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce 605) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6370D).

Feature	GeForce 605	RADEON HD6370D
G3D Mark Score	330+3%	320
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+290%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	96+200%
L1 Cache	32 KB	192 KB+500%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 605 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON HD6370D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 605	RADEON HD6370D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 605 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6370D. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce 605) vs 512 KB (RADEON HD6370D) — the RADEON HD6370D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 605	RADEON HD6370D
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 605 draws 65W versus the RADEON HD6370D's 250W — a 117.5% difference. The GeForce 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce 605) vs 350W (RADEON HD6370D). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce 605	RADEON HD6370D
TDP	65W-74%	250W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	5.1+292%	1.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 605 came in at $30, while the RADEON HD6370D launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce 605 was 40% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.0 (GeForce 605) vs 6.4 (RADEON HD6370D) — the GeForce 605 offers 71.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 605 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce 605	RADEON HD6370D
MSRP	$30-40%	$50
Performance per Dollar	11.0+72%	6.4
Codename	GK107	Cayman
Release	June 5 2012	December 14 2010
Ranking	#837	#596

Search GeForce 605 on Amazon

Search RADEON HD6370D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.