RADEON IGP 345M vs GeForce 6200A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON IGP 345M is positioned at rank #414 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 345M

#397

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

147730%

#412

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

100%

#414

RADEON IGP 345M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#415

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

90%

#416

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

80%

#417

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

80%

#418

Quadro FX 1000

MSRP: $500|Avg: $30

70%

#419

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

60%

#420

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

60%

#421

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

50%

#422

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

40%

#423

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

20%

#424

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

10%

#425

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 6200A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON IGP 345M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RADEON IGP 345M	GeForce 6200A
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 6200A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON IGP 345M Benchmark Check

GeForce 6200A Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 345M and GeForce 6200A

RADEON IGP 345M

The RADEON IGP 345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 345M scores 3 versus the GeForce 6200A's 4 — the GeForce 6200A leads by 33.3%. The RADEON IGP 345M is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce 6200A uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (RADEON IGP 345M) vs 384 (GeForce 6200A). Raw compute: 1.313 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 345M) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A).

Feature	RADEON IGP 345M	GeForce 6200A
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+100%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.313 TFLOPS+82%	0.7227 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	48+100%	24
L1 Cache	192 KB	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON IGP 345M	GeForce 6200A
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON IGP 345M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6200A has 128 MB. The RADEON IGP 345M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	RADEON IGP 345M	GeForce 6200A
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON IGP 345M draws 35W versus the GeForce 6200A's 33W — a 5.9% difference. The GeForce 6200A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 345M) vs 350W (GeForce 6200A). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.