RADEON IGP 350M vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600
RADEON IGP 350M
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON IGP 350M is positioned at rank 328 and the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is on rank 425, so the RADEON IGP 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 350M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON IGP 350M is significantly newer (2016 vs 2008). The RADEON IGP 350M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON IGP 350M.
| Insight | RADEON IGP 350M | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 350M and Quadro FX 500/FX 600
RADEON IGP 350M
The RADEON IGP 350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 350M scores 6 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON IGP 350M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 8+33% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+113% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS+32% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON IGP 350M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON IGP 350M draws 55W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W — a 109.8% difference. The RADEON IGP 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-71% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON IGP 350M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2008).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GT200B |
| Release | July 6 2016 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #667 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON IGP 350M and Quadro FX 500/FX 600
