CPU
GPU
RADEON IGP 350M
Popular choices:
GeForce FX 5600XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON IGP 350M is positioned at rank 328 and the GeForce FX 5600XT is on rank 380, so the RADEON IGP 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 350M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5600XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5600XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON IGP 350M.
| Insight | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+50%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5600XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 350M and GeForce FX 5600XT
RADEON IGP 350M
The RADEON IGP 350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
GeForce FX 5600XT
The GeForce FX 5600XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 350M scores 6 versus the GeForce FX 5600XT's 9 — the GeForce FX 5600XT leads by 50%. The RADEON IGP 350M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce FX 5600XT uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 336 (GeForce FX 5600XT). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600XT).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 9+50% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+52% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS | 1.089 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 448 KB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 512 KB (GeForce FX 5600XT) — the GeForce FX 5600XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON IGP 350M draws 55W versus the GeForce FX 5600XT's 150W — a 92.7% difference. The RADEON IGP 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5600XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-63% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 55°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON IGP 350M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GF114 |
| Release | July 6 2016 | May 17 2011 |
| Ranking | #667 | #605 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON IGP 350M and GeForce FX 5600XT
