RADEON IGP 350M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
RADEON IGP 350M
Popular choices:
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON IGP 350M is positioned at rank 328 and the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is on rank 384, so the RADEON IGP 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 350M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON IGP 350M is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The RADEON IGP 350M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON IGP 350M.
| Insight | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+16.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 350M and GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
RADEON IGP 350M
The RADEON IGP 350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 350M scores 6 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE leads by 16.7%. The RADEON IGP 350M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 7+17% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+78% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS+9% | 0.7488 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 384 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 512 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON IGP 350M draws 55W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 92.7% difference. The RADEON IGP 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-63% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 216mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON IGP 350M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $30 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GF104 |
| Release | July 6 2016 | November 15 2010 |
| Ranking | #667 | #683 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON IGP 350M and GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
