RADEON IGP 350M vs GeForce FX 5500
RADEON IGP 350M
Popular choices:
GeForce FX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON IGP 350M is positioned at rank 328 and the GeForce FX 5500 is on rank 736, so the RADEON IGP 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 350M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce FX 5500 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce FX 5500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON IGP 350M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON IGP 350M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5500 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 350M and GeForce FX 5500
RADEON IGP 350M
The RADEON IGP 350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
GeForce FX 5500
The GeForce FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 350M scores 6 versus the GeForce FX 5500's 8 — the GeForce FX 5500 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON IGP 350M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce FX 5500 uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5500). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5500).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 8+33% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1024+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+230% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2 MB+1438% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON IGP 350M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5500 has 256 MB. The RADEON IGP 350M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 2 MB (GeForce FX 5500) — the GeForce FX 5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON IGP 350M draws 55W versus the GeForce FX 5500's 25W — a 75% difference. The GeForce FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 350M) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5500). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 25W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 171mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.3+200% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | RADEON IGP 350M | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $37 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $30 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | TU117S |
| Release | July 6 2016 | December 17 2021 |
| Ranking | #667 | #468 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON IGP 350M and GeForce FX 5500
