Radeon Pro 5500M
VS
Quadro T2000 (móvel)

Radeon Pro 5500M vs Quadro T2000 (móvel)

AMD

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1575 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5500M is positioned at rank 23 and the Quadro T2000 (móvel) is on rank 105, so the Radeon Pro 5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5500M

#8
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
329%
#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
78%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
74%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
69%
#23
Radeon Pro 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
99%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
89%
#33
Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $200
82%
#36
T600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000 (móvel)

#57
Quadro RTX 3000
MSRP: $800|Avg: $891
97%
#58
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700
95%
#59
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
92%
#60
Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP: $999|Avg: $350
91%
#90
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1061%
#105
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
100%
#111
Quadro P520
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#113
Radeon Pro WX 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
93%
#117
Radeon Pro 580X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
90%
#118
Radeon Pro WX 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $45
90%
#119
CMP 40HX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $120
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5500M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon Pro 5500MQuadro T2000 (móvel)
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%)
Leading raw performance (+3.4%)
Longevity
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T2000 (móvel) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5500M and Quadro T2000 (móvel)

AMD

Radeon Pro 5500M

The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5500M scores 6,730 and the Quadro T2000 (móvel) reaches 6,959 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MQuadro T2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
6,730
6,959+3%
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Turing
Process Node
7 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1536+50%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS+22%
3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1450 MHz
1785 MHz+23%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
96+50%
64
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MQuadro T2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 5500M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the Radeon Pro 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MQuadro T2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MQuadro T2000 (móvel)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MQuadro T2000 (móvel)
Encoder
VCN 2.0
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
VCN 2.0
PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5500M draws 85W versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 60W — a 34.5% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MQuadro T2000 (móvel)
TDP
85W
60W-29%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
79.2
116.0+46%